Skip to main content
· 9/10/2007

Multimedia Patent Trust v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 525 F. Supp. 2d 1200
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66975
  • 2007 WL 2696675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant adequately pleaded inequitable conduct by identifying both the prior art allegedly withheld from the PTO as well as the agents and attorneys who breached their duty of candor
  • “Therefore, an inequitable conduct defense to a patent infringement claim may be stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) for failure to plead with particularity”
  • “[T]he inequitable conduct affirmative defense falls within the strictures 14 of Rule 9(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marilyn L. Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.