· 10/19/2005
Johnson v. AMO RECOVERIES
Citations
- 427 F. Supp. 2d 953
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41613
- 2005 WL 3968292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining there is a distinction between a collector’s letter making a one-time offer, as in Goswami, and a letter stating that the current offer is subject to expiration without indicating anything about the possibility of future offers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whyte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.