Skip to main content
· 10/19/2005

Johnson v. AMO RECOVERIES

Citations

  • 427 F. Supp. 2d 953
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41613
  • 2005 WL 3968292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining there is a distinction between a collector’s letter making a one-time offer, as in Goswami, and a letter stating that the current offer is subject to expiration without indicating anything about the possibility of future offers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whyte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.