Skip to main content
· 6/6/2006

Bulletin Displays, LLC v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Citations

  • 448 F. Supp. 2d 1172
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64074
  • 2006 WL 2560637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibition of applying anti-SLAPP motions to federal question claims 15 ||in federal court is not limited to claims exclusively within federal jurisdiction
  • “Although the anti-SLAPP 21 statute does apply to state law claims brought in federal court . . . it does not apply to 22 federal question claims in federal court because such application would frustrate 23 substantive federal rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.