D.C. Circuit· 4/30/2013

Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Citations

404 U.S. App. D.C. 427
715 F.3d 342
2013 WL 1798998
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

beginning analysis by “bear[ing] in mind the presumption favoring judicial review of agency action”
noting in review of a jurisdiction stripping provision, “[w]e begin, as we must, with the text of the statute” and when “[t]he language is not ambiguous … this court simply is not at liberty to displace, or to improve upon, the jurisdictional choices of Congress”
“Mandamus does not lie when our precedent no longer, at least in part, binds.”
right to mandamus not clear and indisputable in absence of “bind[ing]” precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.