Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• beginning analysis by “bear[ing] in mind the presumption favoring judicial review of agency action”
• noting in review of a jurisdiction stripping provision, “[w]e begin, as we must, with the text of the statute” and when “[t]he language is not ambiguous … this court simply is not at liberty to displace, or to improve upon, the jurisdictional choices of Congress”
• “Mandamus does not lie when our precedent no longer, at least in part, binds.”
• right to mandamus not clear and indisputable in absence of “bind[ing]” precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• NetCoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-08-06
• Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-08-06