Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/31/1989
Bull v. Smith
Citations
- 382 S.E.2d 905
- 299 S.C. 123
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Child support awards are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion
- child support awards are reviewed for abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Badeaux v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 55×
- Thornton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 42×
- Hopkins v. HopkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 25×
- Blackwell v. FulgumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-09· cited 14×
- McDuffie v. McDuffieSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 12×
- Nemeth v. NemethCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 12×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-08-27· cited 54×
- Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-03· cited 46×
- Spires v. HigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-10-25· cited 18×
- Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-05-01· cited 10×
- Nicholson v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.