Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutory defenses to granting divorce on ground of adultery include “. . . (3) [that] the last adulterous act occurred [more than] three years before the complaint for divorce was filed”
• stating that “[a] reviewing court cannot assess witness credibility through a record.”
• observing that “[a] reviewing court cannot assess witness credibility through a record.”
• stating that “[a] reviewing court cannot assess witness credibility through a record. The trier of fact is uniquely situated to make such determinations and this Court is not in a position to, and will not, second guess such determinations.”
• stating that “[a] reviewing court cannot assess witness credibility through a record. The trier of fact is uniquely situated to make such determinations and this Court is not in a position to, and will not, second guess such determinations.”
• stating that “[a] reviewing court cannot assess witness credibility through a record. The trier of fact is uniquely situated to make such determinations and this Court is not in a position to, and will not, second guess such determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).