Skip to main content

Neal v. State

Citations

  • 697 So. 2d 903
  • 1997 WL 400088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecutor's reporting of facts developed by a third party constitutes hearsay
  • holding that the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations when the state failed to provide “any evidence to explain or excuse its delay in serving the arrest warrant”
  • “Some [of the sources of information listed in Mack ] — the telephone directory, for example — are so common and easily accessible that no search that omitted them could possibly be deemed diligent.”
  • “Filing a document does not place it in evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.