Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 687 So. 2d 917
  • 1997 WL 34655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing with Picklesimer that “subsections 775.15(5) and (6) are independent provisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goshorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.