District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/31/1997
King v. State
Citations
- 687 So. 2d 917
- 1997 WL 34655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing with Picklesimer that “subsections 775.15(5) and (6) are independent provisions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goshorn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-18· cited 19×
- Brian Michael Robinson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-11-17· cited 3×
- Chipman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 1×
- Corvea v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-31
- Patel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-18
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-20· cited 31×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-04-23· cited 23×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-11· cited 11×
- State v. PicklesimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-16· cited 10×
- Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-06-09· cited 9×
- Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 8×
- Bragenzer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-03· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.