Skip to main content

Fleming v. State

Citations

  • 524 So. 2d 1146
  • 1988 WL 47256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding lack of diligent search and noting that “the state offered no evidence to explain the four-year delay in executing the capias,” as well as no evidence of “any search”
  • when jurisdiction is challenged by claim that statute of limitations has run, burden is on state to establish that prosecution is not barred
  • four-year delay in executing capias unreasonable where state made no explanation for the delay
  • trial court erred in denying Fleming’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the statute of limitations had expired when “the state offered no evidence to explain the four-year delay in executing the capi-as”
  • prosecution for escape commenced more than three years after it was committed, was barred by statute of limitations, absent evidence to explain state's four-year delay in executing capias or evidence that it had made a diligent search to locate defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.