Norton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to satisfy the diligent search requirement, the State must check obvious sources of information and “follow up on any leads”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• FABIO MATOS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-12-15
• Johnny Romesh Persaud v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-20· cited 31×
• State v. MacK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-11· cited 20×
• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-18· cited 19×
• State v. Perez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 8×
• Cunnell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-17· cited 8×
• Goings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-22· cited 8×
• State v. Paulk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-10· cited 4×
• Schuster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-30· cited 2×