Wells v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• receded from on different grounds in State v. Hampton, 692 So.2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
• \An eighteen-month delay without explanation is unreasonable and will not justify relating the `commencement' of the prosecution back to the filing of the information.\
• \An eighteen-month delay without explanation is unreasonable and will not justify relating the `commencement' of the prosecution back to the filing of the information.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-18· cited 19×
• State v. Picklesimer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-16· cited 10×
• Bragenzer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-03· cited 8×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-12· cited 6×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-31· cited 6×
• Bonel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-08· cited 4×
• State v. Hampton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 3×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-20· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-31· cited 40×
• Colvin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-05· cited 11×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-11· cited 11×
• Sherley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-16· cited 8×