Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras

Citations

• 556 P.3d 291

Syllabus

1. Did the presiding judge of the superior court err by ruling on a motion to designate a party a vexatious litigant under A.R.S. § 12-3201, given his prior voluntary recusal from the underlying dissolution case between the parties? 2. Did the court violate due process by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing in the vexatious litigant proceeding? 3. Was the vexatious litigant designation supported by sufficient evidence?