Skip to main content
· 11/20/2003

Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 79 P.3d 673
  • 206 Ariz. 424
  • 413 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10
  • 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling on alleged disclosure violations reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • on retrial, parties may “‘make new motions, raise new objections, and present additional evidence’”
  • subsequent recusal did not raise substantial question about impartiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Espinosa, Eckerstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.