Skip to main content
· 10/5/2005

Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court

Citations

  • 120 P.3d 1092
  • 211 Ariz. 282
  • 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 106
  • 462 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that article 6, section 3 provides for this Court’s “constitutional power over attorneys as officers of the court”
  • explaining 8 the Arizona Supreme Court’s exclusive authority to regulate attorneys pursuant 9 to article 6, section 3 of the Arizona Constitution
  • “Our adoption of a rule does not constitute a prior determination that the rule is valid and constitutional against any challenge ____Such a determination awaits a judicial proceeding in which opposing interests are provided a full opportunity to be heard.”
  • spirit and purpose considered when construing statute
  • historical background considered when construing statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz, Snow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.