Skip to main content
· 9/16/2005

Matejka v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 386 F. Supp. 2d 198
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20321
  • 2005 WL 2259605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an assessment of RFC on a “function- 16 by-function basis” involves the consideration of exertional capacity in seven areas: sitting, standing, walking, lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling
  • “[A]n impairment is not severe if it has no more than a minimal effect on an individual’s physical or mental ability[] to do basic work activities.” (quoting SSR 85–28 (Policy Clarification), 1985 WL 56856 (Jan. 1, 1985))
  • “if the ALJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence[,] . . . the findings will be sustained even where substantial evidence may support the claimant’s position and despite the fact that the [c]ourt, had it heard the evidence de novo, might have found otherwise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siragusa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.