Matejka v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an assessment of RFC on a “function- 16 by-function basis” involves the consideration of exertional capacity in seven areas: sitting, standing, walking, lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling
• “[A]n impairment is not severe if it has no more than a minimal effect on an individual’s physical or mental ability[] to do basic work activities.” (quoting SSR 85–28 (Policy Clarification), 1985 WL 56856 (Jan. 1, 1985))
• “if the ALJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence[,] . . . the findings will be sustained even where substantial evidence may support the claimant’s position and despite the fact that the [c]ourt, had it heard the evidence de novo, might have found otherwise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. Astrue
  N.D. New York· 2012-09-26· cited 232×
• Gonzalez-Cruz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
  W.D. New York· 2018-03-14· cited 34×
• Wojciechowski v. Colvin
  N.D. New York· 2013-08-26· cited 34×
• Perez v. Barnhart
  W.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 33×
• Diakogiannis v. Astrue
  W.D. New York· 2013-09-30· cited 32×
• Goodale v. Astrue
  N.D. New York· 2012-12-13· cited 15×
• Washington v. Astrue
  N.D. Georgia· 2008-05-15· cited 14×
• Steficek v. Barnhart
  W.D. New York· 2006-11-28· cited 14×
• Karabinas v. Colvin
  W.D. New York· 2014-04-21· cited 13×
• Stafford v. Astrue
  W.D. New York· 2008-09-30· cited 2×
• Brown v. Colvin
  W.D. New York· 2014-09-10· cited 2×
• Vo v. Astrue
  D. South Carolina· 2007-09-05· cited 1×
• Ocasio v. Astrue
  N.D. New York· 2012-11-15· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316
  Second Circuit· 1998-01-23· cited 2,146×
• Josephine A. FOOTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
  Eleventh Circuit· 1995-11-03· cited 1,749×
• David Rutherford v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant
  Second Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 1,373×
• Johnson v. Bowen
  Second Circuit· 1987-04-30· cited 1,020×
• Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Second Circuit· 1983-04-11· cited 791×
• Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
  Second Circuit· 1980-06-18· cited 775×
• Ferraris v. Heckler
  Second Circuit· 1984-02-22· cited 482×
• Edna K. TIENIBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-12-05· cited 329×
• Frank DeCHIRICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1998-01-26· cited 283×
• Myers v. Apfel
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-01-11· cited 239×
• Falcon v. Apfel
  W.D. New York· 2000-03-23· cited 47×
• Campbell v. Barnhart
  D. Connecticut· 2001-11-30· cited 17×
• Pagan on Behalf of Pagan v. Chater
  S.D. New York· 1996-04-24· cited 16×
• Maisch v. Heckler
  S.D. New York· 1985-03-22· cited 9×
• Harrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
  S.D. New York· 1995-10-19· cited 6×
• Diaz v. Bowen
  S.D. New York· 1987-03-30· cited 4×
• Youney v. Barnhart
  W.D. New York· 2003-08-06· cited 2×