Skip to main content
· 6/25/2002

Gotz v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 207 F. Supp. 2d 886
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12567
  • 2002 WL 1446962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The ALJ did not base her finding on plaintiff’s lack of psychiatric treatment. Rather, she noted that the absence of treatment was one reason for attaching significant weight to the reports of Drs. Spear and Kaplan. This was not error.”
  • “The ALJ did not base her finding on plaintiff's lack of psychiatric treatment. Rather, she noted that the absence of treatment was one reason for attaching significant weight to the reports of Drs. Spear and Kaplan. This was not error.”
  • “The ALJ did not base her finding on plaintiff’s lack of psychiatric treatment. Rather, she noted that the absence of treatment was one reason for attaching significant weight to the reports of Drs. Spear and Kaplan. This was not error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.