Skip to main content
· 12/30/1994

Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 38 F.3d 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that treating physician’s opinions and diagnoses “should be accorded considerable weight,” but “are far from conclusive”
  • noting that good cause for affording little weight to a medical opinion is presented when the opinion is brief and conclusory or unsupported by the record
  • affirming ALJ’s decision to disregard the opinion of a treating physician that was “conclusory” and “contradicted by both itself and outside medical evidence”
  • noting in applying the substantial evidence standard, a reviewing court does not reweigh the evidence, retry the issues, or substitute its own judgment
  • noting in applying the substantial evidence standard, a reviewing court does not reweigh the evidence, retry the issues, or substitute its own judgment
  • affirming determination, based in part on testimony of vocational expert, that claimant was able to perform past relevant work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Garza, Berrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.