Munoz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite legislative adoption of subjective standard, due process guarantee of Florida constitution would mandate objective standard in cases involving egregious police activities
• finding that both conduct and prior criminal history of the accused may show that he or she was predisposed to commit the crime charged
• construing section 777.201 to require questions to be submitted to a jury when “reasonable per sons could draw different conclusions from the facts”
• explaining the shifting burden of proof for use in entrapment cases
• “[C]are must be taken in establishing the predisposition of a defendant based on conduct that results from the inducement.”
• \Such direction is consistent with the subjective evaluation of entrapment because the two factual issues above ordinarily present questions of disputed facts to be submitted to the jury as the trier of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• England v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-14· cited 122×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 57×
• State v. Vallejos
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-07-28· cited 43×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 38×
• State v. Murphy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-09· cited 35×
• Bist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-09· cited 30×
• Worley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-03· cited 26×
• Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (97-2)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-07-16· cited 26×
• Holiday v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-24· cited 22×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 19×
• State v. Henderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-02· cited 17×
• Farley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-25· cited 16×
• Vazquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-24· cited 16×
• Izquierdo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-18· cited 13×
• Nadeau v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-20· cited 12×
• Soohoo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-19· cited 12×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-20· cited 11×
• Jimenez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-15· cited 11×
• State of Florida v. Jamal Rashad Laing
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-06· cited 11×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-24· cited 11×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
• Sorrells v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
• Sherman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
• Hampton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
• Jacobson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 691×
• United States v. Sherman
  Second Circuit· 1952-12-16· cited 234×
• Cruz v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-07· cited 140×
• State v. Glosson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-17· cited 132×
• State v. Hunter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-08-29· cited 71×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 66×
• Herrera v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-06· cited 28×
• United States v. Clemente Valdovinos-Valdovinos
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-01-07· cited 21×
• Bowser v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-13· cited 11×
• State v. Munoz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-08· cited 10×