New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/28/1997
State v. Vallejos
Citations
- 945 P.2d 957
- 123 N.M. 739
- 1997 NMSC 040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the subjective and objective approaches are the two major approaches to the defense of entrapment
- stating that the subjective and objective 18 approaches are the two major approaches to the defense of entrapment
- holding “that entrapment, whether 5 subjective or objective, involves matters of due process” in a decision “based entirely on state constitutional grounds”
- neither Federal nor State due process violated where defendant buyer approached police seller in reverse sting operation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minzner, Franchini, Baca, Serna, McKinnon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-10-04· cited 62×
- State v. BarrNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-05-17· cited 61×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-02-16· cited 56×
- Montoya v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 50×
- Case v. HatchNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-04-15· cited 47×
- In Re Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-08-13· cited 34×
- State v. DartezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-10-14· cited 29×
- Erica, Inc. v. New Mexico Regulation & Licensing DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-03-31· cited 21×
- Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-08-11· cited 17×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-03-19· cited 16×
- Town & Country Food Stores, Inc. v. New Mexico Regulation & Licensing Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-22· cited 14×
- Town & Country v. Nm Reg. & LicensingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-22· cited 14×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-17· cited 11×
- State v. BonillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-07-08· cited 10×
- State v. SchaublinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-02-04· cited 9×
- In re Alberto L.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-08-20· cited 8×
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. GratereauxMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-03-20· cited 3×
- State v. SchaublinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-12-03
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 691×
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XThird Circuit· 1982-02-11· cited 317×
- United States v. Norman ArcherSecond Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 262×
- United States v. Jeff BoydSeventh Circuit· 1995-05-10· cited 236×
- United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. ReynoldsNinth Circuit· 1983-07-12· cited 174×
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 166×
- United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanNinth Circuit· 1987-04-03· cited 158×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- State v. GlossonSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-17· cited 132×
- United States v. David BuenoFifth Circuit· 1971-08-18· cited 128×
- United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyTenth Circuit· 1992-05-28· cited 125×
- United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, DefendantsNinth Circuit· 1986-03-04· cited 115×
- Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 111×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.