Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/16/1994
State v. Lee
Citations
- 229 Conn. 60
- 640 A.2d 553
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing seven additional jurisdictions that had recognized objective entrapment before Baca
- “We decline to apply the law of another jurisdiction merely because a portion of the police investigation occurred there.”
- “[i]n the discretionary realm, it is improper for the trial court to fail to exercise its discretion”
- record reflects that trial court’s evidentiary rul- ing was result of mistaken belief that evidence was categorically inadmissible
- trial court has wide latitude to place reasonable limits on such cross-examination “based on concerns about . . . harassment, prejudice, confusion of the issues, the witness’ safety, or interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Borden, Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 150×
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-05-25· cited 115×
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-12· cited 110×
- State v. BovaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 80×
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-13· cited 71×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-27· cited 69×
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-01-20· cited 54×
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 49×
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-07-28· cited 43×
- Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 39×
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-09· cited 36×
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 27×
- Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-30· cited 25×
- State v. ProvostSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-11-30· cited 23×
- State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-09· cited 22×
- State v. KiserConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-10-01· cited 22×
- Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-14· cited 21×
- State v. HiltonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-20· cited 21×
- State v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-08· cited 20×
- State v. BunkerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-14· cited 19×
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 691×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court· 1933-02-13· cited 425×
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 418×
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleThird Circuit· 1978-11-17· cited 350×
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-04-09· cited 208×
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-11-09· cited 182×
- United States v. BeckerSecond Circuit· 1933-02-06· cited 174×
- Barker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 174×
- United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzFirst Circuit· 1985-05-14· cited 170×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.