Skip to main content

State v. Henderson

Citations

  • 955 So. 2d 1193
  • 2007 WL 1263999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that before a jury can hear the defense of subjective entrapment, the defendant bears the burden to show inducement and a lack of predisposition to commit the offense
  • finding no inducement where informant, after years of no communication with defendant, placed a series of calls to the defendant to arrange a drug transaction
  • “Inducement includes persuasion, fraudulent representations, threats, coercive tactics, harassment, promises of reward, or pleas based on need, sympathy or friendship.”
  • “Inducement includes persuasion, fraudulent representations, threats, coercive tactics, harassment, promises of reward, or pleas based on need, sympathy or friendship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.