Mourning v. Ballast Nedam Const., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a ruling on a motion to vacate is usually reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard, but when there is no factual dispute and the trial court’s ruling is a matter of law, the standard of review is de novo
• normally a court’s ruling on a rule 1.540 motion is for abuse of discretion, however, where there is no factual dispute upon which the trial court based its determination to vacate the judgment the order is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).