Campbell v. Goldman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that settlement proposal was invalid for failing to cite section 768.79 as mandated by both the statute and the rule
• holding that settlement proposal was invalid for failing to cite section 768.79 as mandated by both the statute and the rule
• requiring strict compliance with section 768.79(2)(a) and reversing a fee award because the offer failed to cite the statute even though the offer did cite rule 1.442
• failure to comply with time requirements for offers of settlement cannot be considered “mere technical violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).