Skip to main content
· 7/22/1986

Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.

Citations

  • 492 So. 2d 724
  • 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1587
  • 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that strict compliance with rule 1.440 is mandatory and disapproving local practice of attorney setting case for trial by reserving time on judge’s calendar and sending notice to other party
  • noting that the case was not at issue at the time the notice for final hearing was served, as “no answer had yet been filed crystallizing the issues”
  • noting disapproval of similar local practice in Padgett v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Santa Rosa County, 378 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  • fundamental error to set case which was not yet at issue for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, C.J., and Mills, Ervin, Smith, Shivers, Wentworth, Joanos, Thompson, Wigginton, Nimmons, Zehmer and Barfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.