Rosso v. GOLDEN SURF TOWERS CONDOMINIUM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to vacate under rule 1.540(b) where the moving party did not receive a copy of the order until it was too late to file a notice of appeal
• holding that the court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to vacate when no copy of the court’s written order was served on appellant until more than two months after the order of dismissal, when appellant received a copy from appellee’s counsel
• re-versing the denial of a motion to vacate an order, a copy of which was not properly served on the parties pursuant to rule 1.080(h)(1)
• noting that when the court does not serve a party with an order or judgment and' a party is 'thus precluded from bringing a timely appeal, the trial court abuses its discretion in denying a motion to vacate the unserved order or judgment
• reversing and remanding the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s 1.540 motion as the appellant did not timely receive a copy of the trial court’s order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).