Skip to main content

Brown v. Reynolds

Citations

  • 872 So. 2d 290
  • 2004 WL 784502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to comply with the notice requirements of rule 1.440 denied the party procedural due process
  • holding that, after the denial of a pretrial writ of replevin, \the trial court must still make a final adjudication of the claims of the parties in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure\
  • \[Rule 1.440] is designed to safeguard the parties' right to procedural due process.\ (citing Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646, 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987))
  • \The rule [1.440] is designed to safeguard the parties' right to procedural due process. Noncompliance with the rule may violate a party's due process rights. Thus strict compliance with the rule is mandatory.\
  • interpreting Florida’s replevin statute, § 78.067(2), Fla. Stat. (1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brown v. Reynolds

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.