Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/26/2008

People v. Petri

Citations

760 N.W.2d 882
279 Mich. App. 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that erroneously admitting a police officer’s testimony under MRE 701 rather than MRE 702 when the officer “would have qualified” as an expert witness was harmless
holding that a police detective’s testimony regarding the behavior of child sex abusers was not expert testimony because the detective did not offer “a technical or scientific analysis.”
stating that a defendant may not leave it to this Court to search for a factual basis to sustain or reject his position
stating that jury instruction are presumed to cure most errors and that jurors are presumed to follow those instructions
stating that the defendant “may not leave it to this Court to search for a factual basis to sustain or reject his position”
stating that the defendant “may not leave it to this Court to search for a factual basis to sustain or reject his position”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilder, O'Connell, Whitbeck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Petri

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.