Gartin v. S & M NuTec LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the fact that Defendants may have improperly attempted to collect a court filing fee . . . in violation of the [Fair Debt Collection Practices Act] constitutes a pre-existing fact or information falling outside the restrictions of Rule 408(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).