Skip to main content
· 12/27/2000

Walsh v. C & K MARKET, INC.

Citations

  • 16 P.3d 1179
  • 171 Or. App. 536
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an invitation “is not necessarily limited to people who are interested in making a purchase during that specific visit”
  • “[T]he very fact that the plaintiff was in the defendant’s store, even though the plaintiff's immediate purpose had nothing to do with the defendant's business, was held to be to the defendant's economic advantage.”
  • summarizing “economic advantage” and “public invitee” tests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.