· 12/27/2000
Walsh v. C & K MARKET, INC.
Citations
- 16 P.3d 1179
- 171 Or. App. 536
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2052
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an invitation “is not necessarily limited to people who are interested in making a purchase during that specific visit”
- “[T]he very fact that the plaintiff was in the defendant’s store, even though the plaintiff's immediate purpose had nothing to do with the defendant's business, was held to be to the defendant's economic advantage.”
- summarizing “economic advantage” and “public invitee” tests
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.