Skip to main content
E.D. California· 9/24/2015

Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Couch

Citations

  • 134 F. Supp. 3d 1215
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130584
  • 2015 WL 5647946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases that “being required to arbitrate a dispute that the parties did not agree to arbitrate is per se irreparable harm.”
  • “[T]he first 12 Fisher prong is satisfied because [defendant] cannot dispute that he signed the Employment 13 Agreement and twice initialed the Arbitration Clause provisions.”
  • the court “has the authority to enjoin arbitration 3 proceedings where there is no valid, enforceable arbitration agreement between the parties,” such as 4 where a party waived his rights to arbitration
  • “Given that federal courts sometimes must determine whether a party has a right to arbitration (e.g., in the context of a motion to compel arbitration), it follows that the federal judiciary may enjoin arbitration if necessary to enforce its orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawrence, Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.