E.D. California· 9/24/2015
Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Couch
Citations
- 134 F. Supp. 3d 1215
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130584
- 2015 WL 5647946
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collecting cases that “being required to arbitrate a dispute that the parties did not agree to arbitrate is per se irreparable harm.”
- “[T]he first 12 Fisher prong is satisfied because [defendant] cannot dispute that he signed the Employment 13 Agreement and twice initialed the Arbitration Clause provisions.”
- the court “has the authority to enjoin arbitration 3 proceedings where there is no valid, enforceable arbitration agreement between the parties,” such as 4 where a party waived his rights to arbitration
- “Given that federal courts sometimes must determine whether a party has a right to arbitration (e.g., in the context of a motion to compel arbitration), it follows that the federal judiciary may enjoin arbitration if necessary to enforce its orders.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawrence, Neill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellNinth Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 2,463×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 1,831×
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 1,646×
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 1,625×
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 1,215×
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court· 2009-03-09· cited 1,112×
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 909×
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 482×
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court· 1985-04-03· cited 447×
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.First Circuit· 2005-03-16· cited 302×
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 288×
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 278×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.