Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 339 S.W.3d 365
  • 2011 WL 1330565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ujpon closer reading, it becomes apparent that appellant has taken that approach for one reason only ... to circumvent the consequences of failing to object to the trial court’s action in cumulating the sentences.”
  • “[U]pon closer reading, it becomes apparent that appellant has taken that approach for one reason only . . . to circumvent the consequences of failing to object to the trial court’s action in cumulating the sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Campbell, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.