Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/14/2008
Williams v. State
Citations
- 253 S.W.3d 673
- 2008 WL 2081614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that statutory interpretation is a question of law and is reviewed de novo on appeal
- observing that ―we give exclusive effect of a specific provision over a more general provision . . . when the two irreconcilably conflict‖
- requiring statutes to be interpreted according to their “plain language, unless the language is ambiguous or the interpretation would lead to absurd results that the legislature could not have intended”
- courts construe statute according to plain language unless language is ambiguous or would lead to absurd results that legislature could not have intended
- “The ‘chapter’ that this subsection refers to is Chapter 481, the Texas Controlled Substances Act.”
- “Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, this court conducts a de novo review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Karenev v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-22· cited 453×
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-18· cited 167×
- Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-14· cited 141×
- Tapps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-09-30· cited 120×
- Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-30· cited 89×
- Baird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-08· cited 85×
- Moore, Jammie LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-20· cited 78×
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-05-10· cited 73×
- Nzewi v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-01-24· cited 52×
- Tha Dang Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-02-08· cited 46×
- Spence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-15· cited 42×
- Ex Parte Christopher Ruben ZavalaTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2013-12-11· cited 39×
- Uyamadu v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-12-29· cited 33×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-11-12· cited 26×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-07-27· cited 21×
- Ariel Medina v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-08· cited 20×
- Melissa Dromgoole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-23· cited 18×
- Dinesh Kumar Shah v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-29· cited 17×
- Benito Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2018-11-01· cited 17×
- Philip Wade Ellison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-03-25· cited 14×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- LaPorte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-10· cited 266×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-26· cited 190×
- Cheney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-29· cited 169×
- Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-16· cited 168×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 85×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.