Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 253 S.W.3d 673
  • 2008 WL 2081614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statutory interpretation is a question of law and is reviewed de novo on appeal
  • observing that ―we give exclusive effect of a specific provision over a more general provision . . . when the two irreconcilably conflict‖
  • requiring statutes to be interpreted according to their “plain language, unless the language is ambiguous or the interpretation would lead to absurd results that the legislature could not have intended”
  • courts construe statute according to plain language unless language is ambiguous or would lead to absurd results that legislature could not have intended
  • “The ‘chapter’ that this subsection refers to is Chapter 481, the Texas Controlled Substances Act.”
  • “Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, this court conducts a de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.