Skip to main content

Ford v. State

Citations

  • 1 S.W.3d 691
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
  • 1999 WL 722547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof that an explanation was incorrect is insufficient to satisfy a Batson challenger’s burden of persuasion
  • holding that defendant failed to prove prosecutor’s explanation was pretext when he failed to cross-examine prosecutor and did not offer evidence rebutting explanation
  • holding appellant met his burden of production regarding Batson challenge at trial, but failed to meet his burden of persuasion at trial
  • requiring presentation to trial court of Batson claim based on comparison analysis to preserve issue
  • requiring presentation to trial court of Batson claim based on comparison analysis to preserve issue
  • requiring presentation to trial court of Batson claim based on comparison analysis to preserve issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, McCormick, Meyers, Keller, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

139 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.