Skip to main content

Moore v. Moore

Citations

  • 634 A.2d 163
  • 535 Pa. 18
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “post-trial motions are an unnecessary step in a custody appeal as the concept of waiver would be inappropriate in a case where the welfare of the child is the ultimate concern of the [c]ourt”
  • stating that “A motion for reconsideration is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court....”
  • explaining that “a motion for reconsideration does not act as a stay of the appeal period”
  • noting that post-trial motions are not required in custody cases as “the concept of waiver would be inappropriate in a ease where the welfare of the child is the ultimate concern of the Court”
  • stating, a motion for reconsideration of an order does not stay the deadline in which to file a notice of appeal
  • although scope of review in custody cases is broad, appellate court erroneously substituted its own judgment for that of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.