Skip to main content

M.B.S. v. W.E.

Citations

  • 232 A.3d 922
  • 2020 Pa. Super. 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in light of the subject child’s imminent 18th birthday, “all of [mother’s appellate issues] are moot because we are unable to provide the relief she seeks with an order that will have legal force or effect”
  • concluding issues concerning a child who turned eighteen during the pendency of appeal are moot
  • explaining that this court “may address mootness sua sponte, as we generally cannot decide moot or abstract questions” (citations omitted and formatting altered)
  • explaining that this Court “cannot decide moot or abstract questions” (citations omitted and formatting altered)
  • stating that this Court “may address mootness sua sponte, as we generally cannot decide moot or abstract questions, nor can we enter a judgment or decree to which effect cannot be given”
  • stating that “because the trial court did not decide physical or legal custody, or change the amount of custodial time that either party had with the children, its failure to examine the [section 5328(a)] factors was not error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named M.B.S. v. W.E.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.