Skip to main content

Jordan v. Jackson

Citations

  • 876 A.2d 443
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 208
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in refusing a party’s request for the court to order the mother to undergo a psychological examination prior to the custody hearing
  • holding, “[i]t is clearly within the court’s discretion whether to order an evaluation” under Rule 1915.8
  • holding “[i]t is clearly within the court’s discretion whether to order an evaluation”
  • interpreting Rule 1915.8(a) and stating that “[i]t is clearly within the court’s discretion whether to order an evaluation.”
  • appellate interference is allowed only where it is found that the child custody order is manifestly unreasonable as shown by the evidence of record
  • \It is clearly within the court's discretion whether to order an evaluation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Melvin, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.