Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Courts should be wary of deciding matters as sensitive as questions of custody by the invocation of `presumptions.'\
• “Courts should be wary of deciding matters as sensitive as questions of custody by the invocation of ‘presumptions.’ ”
• \[O]ur law has long recognized that the scope of review of an appellate court reviewing a custody matter is of the broadest type.\
• “[0]ur law has long recognized that the scope of review of an appellate court reviewing a custody matter is of the broadest type.”
• “Courts should be wary of deciding matters as sensitive as questions of custody by the invocation of ‘presumptions.’ ”
• “Courts should be wary of deciding matters as sensitive as questions of custody by the invocation of ‘presumptions.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).