Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a definitive factual finding of physical abuse is not required to issue an order of protection
• subject of civil protective order faces, inter alia, “immediate loss of his children . . . and possession of the marital residence,” as well as “future ramifications” with “long-term impact” on marital litigation
• procedural due process requires (1) adequate notice; (2) adequate opportunity for a hearing; (3) the right to introduce evidence; and (4) the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses
• procedural due process requires (1) adequate notice; (2) adequate opportunity for a hearing; (3) the right to introduce evidence; and (4) the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses
• \Procedural '[d]ue process requires (1) adequate notice; (2) adequate opportunity for a hearing; (3) the right to introduce evidence; and (4) the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.'\ (alteration in original
• \The Protection from Domestic Abuse Act was enacted to deal with the problem of abuse between family members. The effect of the Act was to bring the parties before a judge as quickly as possible to prevent further violence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. FERNANDO A.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 74×
• Rouvet v. Rouvet
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-22· cited 19×
• Doe v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-11-17· cited 17×
• Tobias v. Rice
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-19· cited 2×
• Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. Lethem
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2011-06-30· cited 1×
• Diannia R. Taylor v. Reginald B. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-04-05

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Craig v. Boren
  Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
• Arnett v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 2,038×
• State Ex Rel. Williams v. Marsh
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-01-12· cited 136×
• Burkstrand v. Burkstrand
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-30· cited 81×
• Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy Examiners
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-09-25· cited 79×
• Kellogg v. City of Gary
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-08· cited 65×
• Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. Hartvigsen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 63×
• Kampf v. Kampf
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-12-21· cited 48×
• State v. Dispoto
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-01-18· cited 38×
• Townsend v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-08-19· cited 32×
• Denene, Inc. v. City of Charleston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 31×
• Baker v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 27×
• Clear Channel Outdoor v. City of Myrtle Beach
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 23×
• Brown v. South Carolina State Board of Education
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 22×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-12-16· cited 22×
• Weissenburger v. Iowa District Court for Warren County
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2007-10-26· cited 18×
• GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-25· cited 17×
• Bridwell v. Bridwell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-05-03· cited 12×