Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/19/1996
Townsend v. Townsend
Citations
- 474 S.E.2d 424
- 323 S.C. 309
- 1996 S.C. LEXIS 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a judges ruling on a motion for continuance will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion that prejudices the moving party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 120×
- Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-01-04· cited 75×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-10-31· cited 52×
- Nasser-Moghaddassi v. MoghaddassiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 37×
- In the interest of T.P.Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2008-08-27· cited 31×
- Charleston County School District v. Charleston County Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-02· cited 30×
- Glaze v. GroomsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-18· cited 27×
- Mazzone v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 22×
- Fleming Ex Rel. Fleming v. AsbillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-03-31· cited 22×
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-11· cited 17×
- Marchant v. MarchantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-01· cited 15×
- Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-02-08· cited 10×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-24· cited 9×
- Rozmus v. RozmusNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 8×
- Baker v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-21· cited 6×
- In Re TPCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2008-08-27
- Sellers v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-08-05
- Sellers v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-12-02
- Forman v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-11-09
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 91×
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 36×
- Shainwald v. ShainwaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-07-23· cited 34×
- Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-02-10· cited 33×
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-02-07· cited 25×
- Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-05-25· cited 12×
- Crout v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-14· cited 10×
- State v. GoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 6×
- Golden v. GallardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.