Weissenburger v. Iowa District Court for Warren County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Husband was prohibited from possessing firearms pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(8) where he was subject to a continuing no-contact order with Wife
• holding that Iowa courts have no authority to modify a domestic abuse no-contact order to allow the person subject to the order to possess firearms
• explaining purpose of nunc pro tunc order is to correct a clerical error so that the judgment reflects what was actually done
• noting a court may not use a nunc pro tunc order to change the decision by correcting a judicial error
• distinguishing between a nunc pro tunc order, which corrects a clerical error, and procedures to alter, vacate, or modify judgments
• explaining purpose of nunc pro tunc order is to correct a clerical error so that the judgment reflects what was actually done

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).