Davis v. Greenwood School District 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding teachers' reliance on pay raises if they attained additional certification was not reasonable when district superintendent indicated raise was subject to school board approval
• precluding recovery in promissory estoppel, despite teachers’ reliance upon superintendent’s promise of an incentive payment because the payment was conditioned on the school board’s approval
• holding it is unreasonable to rely on a conditional promise
• affirming a grant summary judgment on the issue of promissory estoppel because the promisees failed to show their reliance was reasonable when they claimed they relied upon a promise for a pay increase but they had been informed the increase was subject to the Board's approval
• “[T]he Statute of Frauds requires that a contract that cannot be performed within one year be in writing and signed by the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).