Wright v. Craft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an admitted business practice of failure to disclose past wrecks or damage to a car being resold demonstrated “potential for repetition”
• recognizing that “each case must be evaluated on its own merits to determine what a plaintiff must show to satisfy the potential for repetition/public impact prong of the UTPA”
• noting that an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for review
• noting that an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for review
• holding an issue listed in appellant's statement of issues on appeal but not addressed in the brief was abandoned
• ruling an issue \listed in [the] statement of issues on appeal\ but not addressed in the brief was abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).