United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• `purely technical violation of Rule 41 does not require the suppression of evidence'
• noting the “peculiar abrasiveness” of nighttime searches of someone’s home
• ownership interest of 0.0072 percent “not merely unsubstantial but non-existent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).