Skip to main content

Caldwell v. State

Citations

  • 780 A.2d 1037
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 394
  • 2001 WL 1078869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a traffic stop must be justified from the outset by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and that the investigation must be reasonably related in scope to the stop’s initial justification to comport with the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that a traffic stop must be justified from the outset by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and that the investigation must be reasonably related in scope to the stop’s initial justification to comport with the Fourth Amendment
  • relying on statute that allowed officers to question detained motorists on destination
  • finding nervous behavior and an odd assertion insufficient to support reasonable suspicion
  • \the legitimating raison d'etre of [a traffic] stop may evaporate if its pursuit is unreasonably attenuated or allowed to lapse into a state of suspended animation\ to pursue a drug investigation
  • “A new trial is warranted only if the defendant can show that there is a reasonable probability that a joint trial caused substantial prejudice to the defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.