Supreme Court· 6/20/2016

Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

Citations

579 U.S. 261
195 L. Ed. 2d 423
2016 U.S. LEXIS 3927
136 S. Ct. 2131
119 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065
26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 278
84 U.S.L.W. 4438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Board’s interpretation of the petition to have implicitly presented a challenge was unreviewable
holding that challenges to “the content of the Director’s institution instructions . . . focus directly and ex- pressly on institution standards” and are thus unreviewa- ble
noting that it was not addressing challenges that implicate consti- tutional questions, which present distinct issues regarding congressional preclusion of judicial review
noting that it was not addressing challenges that implicate consti- tutional questions, which present distinct issues regarding congressional preclusion of judicial review
explaining that, although a party that initiated an inter partes review “need not have a concrete stake in the outcome,” it “may lack constitutional standing” to sue in federal court
noting that “different evidentiary burdens” between the IPR proceedings and the court’s claim construction “mean that the possibility of inconsistent results is inherent to Congress’ regulatory design.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.