D.C. Circuit· 7/27/2012
Michael Friedman v. Kathleen Sebelius
Citations
- 402 U.S. App. D.C. 15
- 686 F.3d 813
- 2012 WL 3055520
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pointing to other sections where “the phrase ‘relating to’ denotes a factual relationship”
- “A ‘law or regulation’ . . . cannot refer to the facts of a particular incident.”
- “The [agency’s] decision . . . was arbitrary and capricious with respect to [the determination at issue] because it failed to explain its departure from the agency’s own precedents.”
- “related to” and “relating to” are “functionally identical”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Williams, Ginsburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Nicholas SlattenD.C. Circuit· 2017-08-04· cited 61×
- Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCNinth Circuit· 2018-09-18· cited 42×
- Collins v. Securities & Exchange CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2013-11-26· cited 14×
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-06-11· cited 8×
- Gumpad v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-25· cited 5×
- MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight CouncilDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-30· cited 3×
- Epsilon Electronics, Inc. v. United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets ControlDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-07· cited 2×
- Kearney Reg'l Med. Ctr., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Eighth Circuit· 2019-08-19· cited 2×
- People v. CrouseColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-12-19· cited 2×
- Department of Medical Assistant Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. HHSD.C. Circuit· 2020-08-04· cited 1×
- Jones v. SturekDistrict of Columbia· 2013-05-02
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-11
- Department of Medical Assistance Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-30
- Bailey v. AzarDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-22
- Gross v. United States Inspector GeneralDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-09
- United States v. KingDistrict of Columbia· 2023-11-30
- Timothy Baxter v. Robert Kennedy, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2025-04-29
- Wilson v. Social Security OfficeDistrict of Columbia· 2025-11-18
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 8,363×
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 3,550×
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 3,459×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 1,857×
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 1,837×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,645×
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 1,089×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 916×
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 510×
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 322×
- Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 320×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 269×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.