Michael Friedman v. Kathleen Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pointing to other sections where “the phrase ‘relating to’ denotes a factual relationship”
• “A ‘law or regulation’ . . . cannot refer to the facts of a particular incident.”
• “The [agency’s] decision . . . was arbitrary and capricious with respect to [the determination at issue] because it failed to explain its departure from the agency’s own precedents.”
• “related to” and “relating to” are “functionally identical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).