Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1/18/1980

Miotk v. Rudy

Citations

605 P.2d 587
4 Kan. App. 2d 296
1980 Kan. App. LEXIS 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where the court found no evidence other than defendant’s employment as plaintiffs attorney of attorney’s apparent authority to settle plaintiffs action
an attorney does not acquire the implied authority to compromise and settle a client’s case merely by being employed
principal liable for all acts of agent within apparent scope of authority conferred on it
“All such acts and contracts of the agent as are within the apparent scope of the authority conferred on him, although no actual authority to do such acts or to make such contracts has been conferred, are also binding upon the principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Abbott, Swinehart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.