Skip to main content
· 6/14/1945

Swift & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 14 Cust. Ct. 171
  • 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[N]o presumption of prejudice arises in the absence of evi- dence of a purposeful intrusion that conveys the content of attorney-client communications to the prosecution.”
  • “[N]o presumption of prejudice arises in the absence of evi- dence of a purposeful intrusion that conveys the content of attorney-client communications to the prosecution.”
  • “Typically, in order to require a remedy, a defendant must offer some evidence that the violation of a constitutional right has resulted in some harm or prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cline, Ekwall, Keepe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.