Swift & Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to \divestiture of the instrumentalities\ in a case raising both Sherman Act and Clayton Act claims
• federal court had jurisdiction to enjoin even intrastate commerce where (1) court issued injunction pursuant to parties’ settlement of case and (2
• “[E]ight reasons are relied on as showing that, in whole or in part, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”
• “On a motion to vacate, the determination . . . that a case or controversy existed is not open to attack.”
• order confirming plan would not be set aside even if contained error of law where order was neither void nor a mistake, and there was no allegation of fraud
• “[A] suit for an injunction deals primarily, not with past violations, but with threatened future ones[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).