Skip to main content

Walson v. Walson

Citations

  • 556 S.E.2d 53
  • 37 Va. App. 208
  • 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that attorney’s representations to the contrary were insufficient to give rise to apparent authority when his client had manifestly limited his authority during prior negotiations
  • discussing common law agency principles, specifically those distinguishing actual from apparent authority, in the context of an attorney-client relationship
  • discussing common law agency principles, specifically those distinguishing actual from apparent authority, in the context of an attorney-client relationship
  • noting the sole issue on appeal involves determining whether apparent authority existed
  • reversing trial court’s decision that wife was bound by her attorney’s signature on a property settlement agreement when the attorney lacked actual, implied, or apparent authority to accept the terms of negotiation or execute the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clements, Annunziata

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.