Skip to main content
· 7/2/1981

Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State Bank

Citations

  • 630 P.2d 721
  • 6 Kan. App. 2d 543
  • 23 A.L.R. 4th 841
  • 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 187
  • 1981 Kan. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that forged endorsement as pertains to conversion under relevant statute governing conversion of instruments does not preclude a finding of conversion where an unauthorized signature does not constitute forgery in strict sense
  • “There is no substantial difference between an unauthorized indorsement and a forged indorsement, the result being the same insofar as concerns the passing of title.”
  • in case of conversion interest is allowed by way of damages and “[t]he allowance is not dependent on statute ... but is merely designed to make the plaintiff whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Spencer, Parks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.